[Mites] Overlord S3 - 02 [1080p, 60FPS, x265, aac].mkv

Category:
Date:
2018-07-17 15:36 UTC
Submitter:
Seeders:
0
Information:
No information.
Leechers:
0
File size:
311.1 MiB
Completed:
358
Info hash:
5d67ba600670572ffb2aaf8bcaaa33c081170e40
Overlord Season 3 Episode: 2 Video- Codec: H265 Bitdepth: 8 Encoder: x265 resolution: 1920x1080 Framerate: 60 Audio- Codec: AAC Language: Japanese Subtitles: English encoded to x265 8bit @ 60fps using interpolation. Original source by: [Erai-Raws](https://nyaa.si/user/Erai-raws)

File list

  • [Mites] Overlord S3 - 02 [1080p, 60FPS, x265, aac].mkv (311.1 MiB)
>60FPS This belongs in the trash bin along with all the oversharpened upscales of 90's & early 00's anime... Let dead memes rest in peace, please.

Mites (uploader)

User
@Kryo It's easy to complain when you haven't even downloaded the torrent. What's your complaint exactly :). Fast moving frames are easier to watch now since the stutter is removed because of the added frames. Animations stay the same.
My complaint is that your release looks like vomit. Where do I even start? First of all, you made it "60FPS", or to be exact, 59,940FPS, by adding horrifying [blurred in-betweens](https://i.imgur.com/fDXw96I.jpg) to the original. We can't talk about "doubling" the FPS, because the original is in 23,067FPS. This means that some frames have one and some two vomit frames in-between. This two frame vomitorium (example two back to back frames: [1](https://i.imgur.com/mOSggg2.jpg) & [2](https://i.imgur.com/dOxp5sC.jpg) ) that happens every now and then is extremely noticeable even in motion, there is no need to pause. You didn't remove any stutter, you actually managed to add a horrifying stutter to the original since now thanks to the variable amount of added blur-frames the actual time between some of the original frames is twice as long as the others. You just had to jump to 60FPS for the meme value, because if you had any idea of how to actually do an interpolation without murdering the frame timing, you would've picked something closer to 46 or even 69 FPS. Not to mention the constant, highly visible artifacts, like [everything closer than an inch to the edges of the screen looking like an LSD trip](https://i.imgur.com/8I00zJj.jpg) since the algorithm you're using can't even get the easiest panning shots right, and just flat out [random shapes appearing](https://i.imgur.com/C5l6QqI.jpg) where none were present in the surrounding frames. As expected when you dropped the filesize in one third of the original, despite the more aggressive encoding, the lower bitrate compared to the original is very noticeable, and thank god this episode didn't include too much bitrate heavy scenes because it wouldn't have ended well for your encode. Your notion of this "60FPS" treatment improving, let alone the "animation staying the same", is as ridiculous as taking a steaming dump on a gourmet dish and saying that it's twice as good since there's twice as much of it now.

Mites (uploader)

User
@Kryo I compared the encode beforehand and there is almost no difference in quality, I don't know about the stutter you were talking about since I haven't noticed it myself... I know how to use x265 encoding, and I've a good cpu that why I can compress it properly without any qualityloss (99%). Bitrate heavy scenes wouldn't have mattered, since I've set the encoding program to use more if needed. Your statement that there are some blurry scenes is just to fill up some of the frames that would be missing. Yes there are some unavoidable shapes but they are only in quick scenes and barely noticeable (for me at least). I haven't noticed them myself. But if you go frame by frame you see some ofcourse. "I think" 60fps interpolation actually improved the moving scenes quite a bit compared to 23,976 aka 24fps. Interpolation always has some drawbacks. You only showed the "extreme" examples like the intro scene in the first seconds where ofcourse 60fps can't even keep up since the scene is so fast. If you go frame by frame you will OFCOURSE notice that -_-. By normally watching you wouldn't or you're someone who can only see things in slowmotion. Stop checking frame by frame and watch normally even the extreme demiurge example you stated wasn't noticeable: https://gyazo.com/91d848d3287486ed341c5eb20163c732 the same with the einz example again you checked frame by frame where there are 2 frames that blocked a little bit but when you play it you don't see it: https://gyazo.com/b4fcb27c54bef6c28953a3e8f3ba5404 legit invisible frames but you can apparantly see them.I'll give you the intro example where the scene goes down really fast but thats unavoidable since the scene is so fast 60 frames aren't enough to fill all the gaps, I'm not going to up the fps for only that scene. Everyone has their own opinion about these releases and I won't judge, but showing examples that aren't noticeable when watching it is pretty weird. :)

Mites (uploader)

User
@fapper np. :)
Where's the 144FPS release?
>without any qualityloss (99%). Lmao! Memes are running more than 60fps!

AXZ

User
>I know how to use x265 encoding, and I’ve a good cpu that why I can compress it properly without any qualityloss (99%).
This was great, reminded me to add "60fps" as blacklist word in sonarr.
come on guys can’t you just act like you can’t see this torrent like we can’t see over 60fps , and stop seeing this guy as some kind of HERETICS!!

Mites (uploader)

User
@AXZ Lossless would make it bigger. I meant any noticeable qualityloss.
60 fps for talking heads and panning shots Genius. interpolated frames still managed to have garbled blocks This is hilarious, please make more.

Mites (uploader)

User
@XRA9 Will do o7
@Kryo wow complaining about others when you're getting stuff for free, very educated, much polite, very genius... you know what, at least @Mites tried to make an efforts here, he might failed in his attempt to you, but to other people like me, he succeeded in learning and getting experiences, and look at you, being so pessimistic and rudely complaining even though you're just leeching, have some shame. And rather than criticizing others, how about you do your own release of "60fps* and see if you can get better download than him, or just delete his release and download other people's instead without complaining and making you looks like a teenager trying hard to make himself looks matured and genius in social media. @Kryo, I've read your comments on @Mites's previous release I have a pretty good pc setup which i doubt you gonna say as shit, unless you have equal or better than Titan Xp or 1080ti and intel core i9 cpu. But since i have to continue my study far than my home, i had to rent house and are able to bring only my laptop, which is not intended for gaming, but still can do so with low to medium setting depending on the game. I have used SVP in my pc and i missed it since my laptop can really give a good output using svp, and as someone who used to use svp on a good pc before, his release aren't that bad as you claimed to be, or at least, it is not noticeable with casual watching on my laptop. so can you stop showing off how "superior" your maturity and how "smart" your mind are? And to @Mites, thanks man, and ignore these kind of "polite" and "clever" guy, you're doing good enough and keep it up.