Note: Since the Blu-ray's blurry, we sharpened the video a bit, and you can see the difference in the comparison screenshots.
-- Video --
Format : HEVC
Bit rate : 630 Kbps
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1 080 pixels
Frame rate : 23.976 fps
Bit depth : 10 bits
-- Audio --
Format : AAC
Bit rate : 384.0 Kbps
Channel(s) : 5.1 channels
Sampling rate : 48.0 KHz
Language(s) : Japanese
-- Subtitle --
Language(s) : English (Subtitles by ggkthx)
: Japanese
-- Screenshots --
https://imgsli.com/MTU3NzQ4
What made you decide to encode differently that you always had. We use to look forward to your releases because quality was consistent and they were also encoded avc8bit. AVC encoded files are compatible with almost every media player in the world. HEVC is not, It's the complete opposite. AVC adaptability is unmatched. By simply increasing the frame rate, AVC accomplishes the same as HEVC. It's value only appears when working with 4k files.
HEVC space saving,is nothing of the sort when it's used to create a higher quality picture. HEVC really only saves space by denoising by default which degrades quality. And that's why equivalent quality encodes between HEVC and AVC are almost always roughly same size. This is exactly why no reputable encode group encodes with HEVC. Because there isn't any reason to needlessly spend 4x as long encoding for roughly same file size and quality. Thus only real reason for HEVC usage is smaller HDResolutions from/with 4K sources.
Thanks for sharing
Comments - 2
kaiserstar1
JustSayNo2Funi